On July 1, 2013, several changes to South Dakota's statutes on exemptions from levy and attachment went into effect. S.D.C.L. §43-45-2
was amended by adding a new subsection (8) for "[a]ny health aids
professionally professionally prescribed to the debtor or to a dependant
of the debtor." S.D.C.L. §43-45-4,
commonly known as the "wildcard" exemption, was amended to raise the
limit on the value of other exempted personal property by a debtor as
head of a family to $7,000.00 and by a debtor not the head of a family
to $5,000.00.
Property exemptions are located in various titles
and chapters of the South Dakota Code. When using West's South Dakota
Codified Laws in print or on WestlawNext, it is recommended that you use
the index. To locate property exemption statutes, first look under the
heading "Debtors and Creditors," and the subheading "Exempt
property." Bloomberg Law, Fastcase, the Legislative Research Council
website, and Lexis Advance do not include indexes for the South Dakota
statutes. When using these resources to locate property exemption
statutes, it is recommended that you begin with South Dakota Codified
Laws chapters 43-45, 43-31, 58-12, 58-37A, 61-6, and 62-4. For all the resources mentioned above, you should do further research to find additional exemption statutes within the Code.
In other recent legal news affecting the law of debtors and
creditors, the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth
Circuit in Mehlhaff v. Allred (In re Mehlhaff) upheld the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota's order
that a debtor's prepetition alimony award was property of her
bankruptcy estate within 11 U.S.C. §541(a)(1), and was not expressly
excluded by §541(b) or (c)(2). In addition, the Eighth Circuit Panel
quoted the South Dakota Supreme Court in Jasper v. Smith, 540
N.W.2d 399, 403-04 (S.D. 1995): "[a]n examination of the statutes shows
the [South Dakota] legislature has seen fit to exempt certain property
from the attachment process in SDCL ch. 43-45 but alimony is not one of
them." The Panel also noted that although the federal bankruptcy
exemption scheme provided a specific exemption for future alimony
payments in 11 U.S.C. §522(d)(10)(D), South Dakota opted out of this
scheme and does not provide an alimony exemption.
(This entry was originally written and posted by Marsha Stacey)
No comments:
Post a Comment